{
  "version": 1,
  "event_id": "evt_ec97a671f9b9f595",
  "url": "https://xiyu.news/events/evt_ec97a671f9b9f595/",
  "json": "https://xiyu.news/api/events/evt_ec97a671f9b9f595.json",
  "type": "security_incident",
  "status": "monitoring",
  "category": "technology",
  "title": {
    "zh": "作者诉微软/OpenAI案：未封存的法庭简报公开",
    "en": "OpenAI Feared \"Optics\" of what might appear on Hacker News"
  },
  "current_state": {
    "zh": "在作者协会诉微软与OpenAI一案中，最新解封的法庭简报披露了内部沟通内容，显示两家公司的高管和员工知晓大规模使用盗版书籍属于违法，并将使作者失去工作。文件引用了OpenAI员工Ryan Lowe在2020年7月对继续使用LibGen进行图书摘要项目的风险评估，他写道存在“超过80%”的概率被问到“书籍数据是从哪里来的”，而回答只能是“我们不能说”。\n\n这些文件为作者方提供了关于盗版书籍数据如何获取及其内部认知的具体证据，作者协会据此主张两家公司系故意违法；而OpenAI与微软则主张其训练行为属于合理使用。\n\n文件还引用了一名OpenAI研究员的说法，称其担心“观感问题”，即“OpenAI使用来自可疑俄罗斯网站的受版权保护数据”登上Hacker News会很糟糕。作者方专家发现最长的一段重合文本占《权力的游戏》的0.62%；有评论者指出，该报道的完整标题还包含副标题“高管们知道其大规模盗版图书属违法，并将使作者失去工作”。",
    "en": "Newly unsealed filings in the Authors Guild v. OpenAI case quote an OpenAI researcher worrying about the 'optics' of training on copyrighted books from a 'sketchy Russian website' appearing on Hacker News, indicating top executives knew the mass book piracy was likely illegal."
  },
  "first_seen_at": "2026-09-27T10:07:41.096314+00:00",
  "last_updated_at": "2026-09-27T10:07:41.096314+00:00",
  "last_material_change_at": "2026-09-27T10:07:41.096314+00:00",
  "confidence": 0.75,
  "updates_count": 1,
  "sources_count": 1,
  "entities": [
    "feared",
    "hacker",
    "news",
    "openai",
    "optics"
  ],
  "identifiers": [],
  "topics": [
    "ai-ethics",
    "authors-guild",
    "copyright-litigation",
    "openai",
    "training-data"
  ],
  "updates": [
    {
      "update_id": "upd_cb7211126d6cbd02",
      "event_id": "evt_ec97a671f9b9f595",
      "occurred_at": "2026-09-27T06:19:33Z",
      "published_at": "2026-09-27T06:19:33Z",
      "first_seen_at": "2026-09-27T10:07:41.096314Z",
      "time_precision": "published",
      "update_type": "initial",
      "material_change": true,
      "title_zh": "作者诉微软/OpenAI案：未封存的法庭简报公开",
      "title_en": "OpenAI Feared \"Optics\" of what might appear on Hacker News",
      "what_changed_zh": "在作者协会诉微软与OpenAI一案中，最新解封的法庭简报披露了内部沟通内容，显示两家公司的高管和员工知晓大规模使用盗版书籍属于违法，并将使作者失去工作。文件引用了OpenAI员工Ryan Lowe在2020年7月对继续使用LibGen进行图书摘要项目的风险评估，他写道存在“超过80%”的概率被问到“书籍数据是从哪里来的”，而回答只能是“我们不能说”。\n\n这些文件为作者方提供了关于盗版书籍数据如何获取及其内部认知的具体证据，作者协会据此主张两家公司系故意违法；而OpenAI与微软则主张其训练行为属于合理使用。\n\n文件还引用了一名OpenAI研究员的说法，称其担心“观感问题”，即“OpenAI使用来自可疑俄罗斯网站的受版权保护数据”登上Hacker News会很糟糕。作者方专家发现最长的一段重合文本占《权力的游戏》的0.62%；有评论者指出，该报道的完整标题还包含副标题“高管们知道其大规模盗版图书属违法，并将使作者失去工作”。",
      "what_changed_en": "Newly unsealed filings in the Authors Guild v. OpenAI case quote an OpenAI researcher worrying about the 'optics' of training on copyrighted books from a 'sketchy Russian website' appearing on Hacker News, indicating top executives knew the mass book piracy was likely illegal.",
      "current_state_zh": "在作者协会诉微软与OpenAI一案中，最新解封的法庭简报披露了内部沟通内容，显示两家公司的高管和员工知晓大规模使用盗版书籍属于违法，并将使作者失去工作。文件引用了OpenAI员工Ryan Lowe在2020年7月对继续使用LibGen进行图书摘要项目的风险评估，他写道存在“超过80%”的概率被问到“书籍数据是从哪里来的”，而回答只能是“我们不能说”。\n\n这些文件为作者方提供了关于盗版书籍数据如何获取及其内部认知的具体证据，作者协会据此主张两家公司系故意违法；而OpenAI与微软则主张其训练行为属于合理使用。\n\n文件还引用了一名OpenAI研究员的说法，称其担心“观感问题”，即“OpenAI使用来自可疑俄罗斯网站的受版权保护数据”登上Hacker News会很糟糕。作者方专家发现最长的一段重合文本占《权力的游戏》的0.62%；有评论者指出，该报道的完整标题还包含副标题“高管们知道其大规模盗版图书属违法，并将使作者失去工作”。",
      "current_state_en": "Newly unsealed filings in the Authors Guild v. OpenAI case quote an OpenAI researcher worrying about the 'optics' of training on copyrighted books from a 'sketchy Russian website' appearing on Hacker News, indicating top executives knew the mass book piracy was likely illegal.",
      "detailed_summary_zh": "Newly unsealed filings in the Authors Guild v. OpenAI case quote an OpenAI researcher worrying about the 'optics' of training on copyrighted books from a 'sketchy Russian website' appearing on Hacker News, indicating top executives knew the mass book piracy was likely illegal.",
      "detailed_summary_en": "Newly unsealed filings in the Authors Guild v. OpenAI case quote an OpenAI researcher worrying about the 'optics' of training on copyrighted books from a 'sketchy Russian website' appearing on Hacker News, indicating top executives knew the mass book piracy was likely illegal.",
      "background_zh": "美国作家协会与包括《权力的游戏》作者乔治·R·R·马丁在内的十余名知名作家一同对OpenAI提起集体诉讼，微软随后被追加为被告。另外，Ars Technica在2025年12月报道称，OpenAI正设法避免解释其为何删除两个由盗版书籍构成的数据集。",
      "background_en": "The Authors Guild filed a class-action suit against OpenAI alongside more than a dozen well-known writers, including Game of Thrones author George R.R. Martin; Microsoft was later added as a defendant. Separately, Ars Technica reported in December 2025 that OpenAI was seeking to avoid explaining why it deleted two datasets composed of pirated books.",
      "community_discussion_zh": "Hacker News的讨论（551分、511条评论）中，有人批评帖子标题被编辑化处理，多位评论者补充了更完整的原始标题；那句关于“观感”的引用被普遍视为最值得注意的披露。一位评论者表示，他所认识的作者愤怒的是作品被无偿使用，而不是模型能否取代类型小说作家；另一位则认为“GPT-5可取代类型作家”的证据对合理使用分析在法律上有用。",
      "community_discussion_en": "The Hacker News thread (551 points, 511 comments) drew objections that the posted title was editorialized, with several commenters supplying the fuller original headline; the \"optics\" quote was widely highlighted as the most striking disclosure. One commenter argued the authors they know are angry about uncompensated use of their work rather than about models replacing genre writers, while another saw the GPT-5-replaces-genre-authors evidence as legally useful for the fair-use analysis.",
      "market_impact_zh": "这属于AI训练数据版权诉讼大潮中的一条线索，因此对加密市场的传导是间接的：与去中心化数据、数据溯源或AI数据授权叙事相关的代币是最可能受到情绪面影响的板块，但不存在直接的收入、托管或流动性敞口。",
      "market_impact_en": "This is one strand of the broader AI training-data copyright litigation, so any crypto-market transmission is indirect: tokens tied to decentralized data, data-provenance or AI data-licensing narratives are the segments most likely to see sentiment effects, with no direct revenue, custody or liquidity exposure.",
      "importance_score": 7.5,
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49863864",
          "title": "Community discussion"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://authorsguild.org/news/ag-v-openai-top-execs-knew-mass-book-piracy-was-illegal/",
          "title": "Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Top Execs..."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://dev.to/axrisi/libgen-and-the-openai-lawsuit-what-the-unsealed-authors-brief-says-4ahl",
          "title": "LibGen and the OpenAI lawsuit: what the unsealed authors' brief says"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/12/openai-desperate-to-avoid-explaining-why-it-deleted-pirated-book-datasets/",
          "title": "OpenAI desperate to avoid explaining why it deleted pirated ..."
        }
      ],
      "confidence": 0.75,
      "story_ids": [
        "hackernews:story:49863864"
      ],
      "sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://authorsguild.org/news/ag-v-openai-top-execs-knew-mass-book-piracy-was-illegal/",
          "label": "papergirl",
          "source_type": "hackernews",
          "official": false
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}